Weekly Assignment 15

  Since the end of World War II, capitalism has re-emerged as the leading economic system around the world--but not without several periods of crisis. Part of the social upheaval of the 1960s was fed by a growing economic crisis in the developed world, which came to a head during the 1970s. These were followed by economic crises in the early 1990s, the early 2000s, and of course the recent difficulties that began in 2008. Who as benefited most by this re-emergence, and who has benefited least? Your response should fill at least two sides of 8.5x11 paper, and is due at 8:00am Tuesday, April 30.

Globalization and the Brave New World

I. H1N1



A. Swine flu--so named because two strains of the influenza virus effect both pigs and people--influenza A and influenza C. The strain named H1N1 (the current strain causing the high level of concern) is a combination of human, swine, and avian flu, which is why public health officials are concerned about the possibility of it becoming a pandemic.



1. Swine flu--Generally, during the past forty to fifty years has been fairly stable--meaning that the virus has not radically transformed itself during that time period.

B. Industrialization of Agriculture--during the last forty years or so, more and more industrial methods have been brought to bear on agriculture. While much attention has been paid to corporate farms growing crops, especially the genetic modification (GM) of food grains, the greatest effect has been on the animals raised for human consumption. The “intensification” of animal husbandry entails the close enclosure of animals, high caloric diets (particularly feed contain maize/corn), and the use of drugs to fight diseases endemic because of their enclosure and to spur growth.

1. Cattle--generally take the longest of the domesticated animals to raise for meat, Ruminant animals like cattle (as well as sheep and goats) generally prefer to eat grassy plants, but farmers have found that by feeding them extensive amounts of maize, they put on weight faster, and the beef produced has a higher fat content, which humans like to consume.



a) Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)--better known to us as Mad Cow Disease, caused in part by mixing dead livestock killed by the disease with feed. This was especially prevalent in Great Britain as a way to cut feed costs--but BSE jumped from infecting hoofed animals to human beings, and hundreds of people in the British Isles were infected with this fatal disease. The resultant panic over British beef almost killed the industry there.



2. Chickens--touted by the Poultry Council as a health alternative, most chickens bought at the supermarket are less than a month old. From the time they hatch, they are kept in enclosures with bright lights burning; chickens eat as long as it is light by instinct. When the lights finally go out after twenty-eight days or so, the chickens drop where they had been standing from exhaustion; this makes them easy to kill for the “chicken-chokers,” and then the birds can be processes for Sunday dinner.

a) Avian flu--domesticated birds have long added their sicknesses--particularly influenza--to the human disease pool. The intensive husbandry of fowl in Thailand was ground zero for the brief outbreak of avian flu several years ago.



3. Hogs--most hogs consumed world-wide today are raised in confinement, and like cattle are fed a steady diet of maize and antibiotics

a) Hog farming has been especially intensified during the past forty hears. In 1965, there were 53 million hogs on more than 1 million farms in the United States; today 65 million hogs are concentrated on in 65,000 facilities. The reason this concentration is important will be explored below.

b) Early reports from Mexico have placed the outbreak of this strain of swine flu near Veracruz, to a hog facility called Granjas Carroll--a subsidiary of the US company Smithfield Foods, the largest pork-producer in the world--where last year 950,000 hogs were processed. It should be noted that Smithfield denies any involvement in this outbreak, and says that none of the animals processed there have exhibited any influenza symptoms.



C. Shit Happens!--the transference of influenza is explained by humans being in close contact with diseased animals; most of that contact is with the fecal matter the animals produce.



1. Pig shit--pigs produce three times as much fecal matter as do humans, but little is done to process this mountain of feces. North Carolina, for example, has just over 9 million people, and more than 10 million hogs. Most of the hogs are raised on huge facilities in the eastern part of the state, which is drained by warm, slow moving rivers that also created salt marshes. The effect of this pollution several years ago had a devastating effect on the state’s shellfish population--and sickened hundreds of fishermen



2. Chicken shit--recall that during the avian flu panic several years ago, much attention was paid to the possibility of wild birds alighting with domesticated fowl, and infecting them--and then the workers who fed and cleaned the enclosures.

D. The Many Blessing of Capitalism--while the intensification of animal husbandry has kept meat fairly inexpensive, this practice in not without costs.

II. Capitalist Hegemony Challenged



A. France



1. May 1968--began as student protests about the restrictive practices of French universities, it broke open with the inclusion of workers, resulting in the largest general strike in history. Charles deGalle, who had been given near-dictatorial powers as a result of the upheaval over the Algerian War for Independence, fled the country for an air base in Germany before being forced to return. The treachery of the Confédération Générale du Travail and the Communist Party of France, betraying the workers’ cause to curry favor with the deGaulle government, led to the defeat of the workers. These events, however, drastically changed French society, liberalizing many aspects of the day-to-day life in the country.



B. United States

1. Student protest movement--inspired by the Civil Rights Movement (which many of the early leaders of the protest movement took part in) and the disenchantment with the escalation of the conflict in Vietnam, students began challenging the restrictions placed on them while in college.

a) Berkeley Free Speech Movement



b) Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)

c) The Mobilization Against the War (The Mobe)

2. Cultural changes--like in France, the greatest success came with the cultural changes that the movement inspired, rather than any revolutionary political victories.

a) Women’s Liberation--women in the protest movements rebelled against being relegated to making food and other “female” roles.



b) Gay Liberation--Stonewall

3. Economic changes--International capitalism (or, to use the new term, “globalization”), using the mobility of capital, brings workers back under their thumb.

4. Political changes--the New Deal coalition (blue collar white workers, African Americans, and Southern oligarchs) breaks apart from the strains of the white backlash over the Civil Rights Movement. The “Southern Strategy” of the Republican Party (first under Richard Nixon, then under Ronald Reagan) temporarily lured blue collar whites to support the party, but their economic policies (and the large number of non-whites holding blue collar jobs) have combined to make the Republicans resemble a rump regional party.



III. The Capitalist Future?

Rise and Fall of the Oil-agarchy

I. Oil and Gas in the United States

A. Oil and Gas in the Midwest

1. Quaker State--the discovery of oil created a great industrial boom in western Pennsylvania



a) Titusville--the first successful oil well was drilled near Oil Creek near Titusville, Pennsylvania, in 1859. Population grew over night from a 250 people to more that 10,000. The new industry created jobs not only for oil drillers, put also machinists, teamsters, and eventually railroad workers to transport the oil from the wells to refineries and then to customers.

b) Oil used for a variety of purposes; lubricate the machines that were becoming more common, but also for oil lamps (replacing whale blubber), for “medicinal” purposes, and in the growing chemical industry.



c) Sun Oil Company (SUN Oil COmpany--Sunoco) was established in Pittsburgh in 1866, and became one of the first companies to move into the new oil fields being opened in Pennsylvania and Ohio (the Sun Oil Company of Ohio was headquartered in Toledo). Sun was among the early companies to move into the huge Spindletop oil field in eastern Texas, as well.



d) Ohio Oil Company--founded in Lima by a Pennsylvania oil industry veteran named Samuel M. Jones. The Ohio Oil Company was bought out by John D. Rockefeller in the early 1890s; Jones took his profits and moved to Toledo to establish an oil field supply firm called the Acme Sucker Rod Company.

2. Midwest gas boom--the Midwest did produce some oil wells, but the boon to manufacturing in the region came largely because of the discovery of natural gas deposits, which allowed towns and cities in the region to attract companies in need of cheap fossil fuels

a) Glass industry--Toledo, Fostoria, Findlay, and Tiffin all attract glass manufacturers on the promise of cheap natural gas.



B. John D. Rockefeller--the prototypical late 19th and early 20th century industrialist.

1. Standard Oil Company--was originally a partnership with his brother William, Henry Flagler, chemist Samuel Andrews, and silent partner Stephen V. Harkness, and started in 1870. By the time Rockefeller “retired” in 1897, he was the richest man in the world--maybe the richest ever.



a) Cleveland, where Rockefeller was living when he started the company, became one of the early oil refining centers (in the Flats, then an industrial center), along with Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and New York--as well as numerous small refineries in northwest Pennsylvania. Rockefeller’s company became such a high volume customer of railroads that he was able to negotiate “rebates”--or kickbacks--from the railroad companies. These secret rebates gave Rockefeller’s company a competitive advantage over other refiners. When this secret leaked out, the competitors also demanded rebates--but Rockefeller was able to parlay the money he made into the acquisition of other companies, and allowed his company to become “vertically integrated”--that is to say, the company acquired oil fields, machine shops, oil tank cars, and other refineries, so Rockefeller’s company controlled the entire process until the oil product was delivered to the customer.

b) Rockefeller used his control of the market for oil to limit his competitors--he would offer to buy them out, or simply cut prices on his product until the targeted competitor was ruined, and then buy them for pennies on the dollar.

c) Ida Tarbell--one of the businesses that Rockefeller bought belonged to the father of early “muckraker” Ida Tarbell, who exposed Rockefeller’s business practices. This publicity eventually led to the anti-trust action against Standard, and the break-up of the holding company into numerous component parts (including Standard Oil of Ohio--SOHIO--and Samuel M. Jones’ old company, which became Marathon Oil.



C. Spindletop--the discovery of the Spindletop Oil Field in eastern Texas completely changed the oil industry. The daily production of Spindletop by 1902 matched the entire production of the rest of the world’s daily production. This made oil tremendously cheap (eventually driving many other fields in other parts of the country out of production), and it began slowly replacing coal as the fossil fuel of choice: automobiles (one of the reasons that gasoline engines begin predominating); diesel engines replaced steam engines in railroads (and diesel-powered trucks nearly replaced railroads entirely for parts of the 20th century); fuel oil and natural gas replaced coal for heating homes.

1. Gulf Oil Company

2. Texas Oil Company Texaco)

II. Rise of the Petrolarchy



A. British Petroleum--founded in 1901 by William Knox D’arcy, who obtained a concession from the Shah of Iran to explore the country for oil.

1. Dry holes--George Bernard Reynolds, a self-taught geologist who had successfully drilled oil wells in Sumatra for the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, was given the charge of duplicating this success in Iran. Inhospitable conditions and other difficulties led to a prolonged period with no operating wells; eventually, D’arcy brings in other partners to bring more capital to the project--the Concession Sindicate, Ltd.



2. Majid Sulaiman--in May of 1908 the first oil well was successfully drilled in the Middle East, and the second near the same location in Iran just weeks later. Since that discovery, Majid Sulaiman has provided more than 1 billion barrels of oil; more than 7,000 barrels of oil every day are still pumped out of the ground there of sweet light crude. With the refining process, much of that oil has provided the gasoline that powered--and still powers--American automobiles.

3. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC)--was formed after this discovery. Most of the profits from the sale of this oil went into the pockets of the British oil executives, with a much smaller share being skimmed off for the Shah and his associates; the people of Iran saw very little benefit from this enterprise.

B. Royal Dutch Shell

1. Royal Dutch Petroleum Company--formed to drill for oil in the Dutch East Indies (Indonesia)

2. Shell Company--originally formed to import exotic shell for collectors in London by brothers Marcus Samuel and his brother Samuel Samuel; Marcus saw the need to develop a transportation system to get oil from the fields to consumers in Europe (and eventually around the world). His company commissioned the earliest oil tankers to transport oil from the Caspian Sea back to England.

3. Merger--the two companies merged in 1907 in order to compete on a global scale with Standard Oil.

III. Fall of the Petrolarchy--There Will Be Blood

A. The Post-Colonial World--much of the control the industrialized nations--in particular Great Britain and France--exercised over natural resources in other countries was a result of the colonial control they had acquired; this explains in part their desire to retain this colonial control



1. Iran--Prime Minister Ali Razmara in 1950 negotiated a highly unfavorable contract with the AIOC, which had less favorable terms then the Venezuelan government negotiated with Standard Oil, or that the Saudi Arabian government had just concluded with the Arabian-American Oil Company, This was the reason that the AIOC had negotiated with the Shah to place Razmara in this position; this lopsided deal was so disliked, however, that Razmara was assassinated in 1951.

a) The Shah sees the handwriting on the wall, and decides to skip the country to avoid a similar fate.



b) Assassin was a member of the Popular Front, which sought to nationalize the oil assets of Iran. Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh was the secular leader of the party (which had a strong Muslim fundamentalist element, as well). Mossadegh and the Popular Front moved to nationalize the petroleum industry in the country, but the CIA and the British M5 (the British equivalent to the CIA) bribed Iranian officials, and armed dissident factions in the Iranian army, to stage a coup d’etat that resulted in the murder of Mossadegh, and the re-establishment of the Shah to the throne in Iran until the events of 1979.



B. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)--is a cartel of twelve countries made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. Indonesia withdrew its membership in OPEC in 2008 after it became a net importer of oil, but stated it would likely return if it became a net exporter again.

1. Establishment--in 1960, in reaction to US policy that placed duties on Venezuelan and Arab oil in favor of Mexico and Canada, for “national security” purposes.



2. 1973 Oil Embargo--in reaction to the US backing Israel in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, OPEC nations voted to not sell oil to the US. This resulted in supplies drying up, and people not being able to buy gasoline because gas stations had none to sell--even at double the price (from $.25/gal. to $.50/gal).

a) When the embargo ended, the price charged dropped only slightly--and there came a much greater demand for small, fuel-efficient automobiles in the United States that domestic manufacturers were ill-prepared to meet.

b) US economy tumbled as a result, Keynesian economic policy failed, and the re-emergence of the “free market” philosophy re-emerged



3. 1979 Iranian Revolution

a) Fall of the Shah--Shah’s support for oil embargo weakened US support for his government, resulting in tacit support for the return of his clerical opponent, the Ayatollah Khomeini; Shah flees Iran again.

b) Sick with cancer, Shah pleads to enter US for medical treatment; Carter grants this request. Iranian Revolutionary Guard storms American embassy, hold Americans working there hostage until January 20, 1980--when Ronald Reagan took office.



4. Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988)--in the time-honored policy that the enemy of the enemy is my friend, US backed Saddam Hussein in his war for Persian Gulf dominance over Iran. This policy was continued under Ronald Reagan. War ended in a costly stalemate, with great loss of life on both sides.



5. Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait--Saddam Hussein assumed he had implicit US permission, Saddam invaded neighboring Kuwait in order to gain control over greater share of oil assets in the Gulf, resulting in the First Gulf War in late 1991-1992.

Weekly Assignment 14

What effect did the Cold War have on decolonization--and what effect did decolonization have on the Cold War?

Soy Cuba

I Am Cuba (1964)

The Anti-Colonial Century

I. India


A. Indian National Conference (INC)--the political organization in India that advocated for independence--and which is still in existence today. Its most famous member were Mohandas Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru.

1. Mohandas Gandhi--Oxford-trained Indian lawyer. His own experience with racial discrimination in England, South Africa, and India led him to embrace Hindi religious and dietary practices--although he rejected the subjugation of women in society, and fought against the worst of caste practices, seeking equality for all Indians--and independence for the country. Gandhi was western educated, but learned in his time away from India that many British--or, most specifically, the British government--saw him as inferior because of his ethnic background; he spent much of his adult life fighting against that, and fighting for independence for his country.


a) Homespun--Gandhi was a proponent of domestic industry. He insisted on wearing traditional clothing--including a loincloth--from Indian grown cotton. This cotton he himself worked to turn into thread, which he then wove into cloth. This rejection of Western methods endeared him to a large part of India that could not afford western goods--he made their poverty a virtue. Gandhi consciously rejected westernization, and in this way made himself popular among the masses.


b) Salt March--in 1922, to protest the British imposition of a tax on salt, Gandhi and a growing number of followers march 239 miles to the sea to make their own salt, rather than pay the British for their imported salt.

c) “Non-cooperation” movement--after the success of the Salt March, Gandhi encouraged Indians to engage in a non-cooperation movement, where they would refuse to use the British governmental system--especially the courts--and to avoid the purchase of British goods

d) “Quit India” movement--signaled a renewed effort to persuade the British to grant India independence. Indian dissatisfaction with British rule grew throughout the 1930s, as more Indians became impoverished while the British government continued the practices that enriched the metropole in London.



B. Non-violent Civil Disobedience--Gandhi practiced pacifism; in fact, he was the lone figure in the INC to vote against conditional support for the fight against fascism. So this practice he undertook as a matter of principle, rather than for tactical reasons--and his followers often times were not as principled as he was. Non-violent civil disobedience is most effective when it provokes a disproportionately violent response.


1. Quit India--campaign sparked by the fact that the Viceroy of India (and Englishman appointed by the British government) declared war on Germany without consulting any Indians. In response, some breakaway factions of the INC sought out the Japanese. Most, however, followed Gandhi’s call to begin a massive program of civil disobedience. The British responded by sending a representative to negotiate a settlement with INC representatives; when those negotiations broke down, Gandhi renewed his call for civil disobedience to begin.

a) Arrest of INC leadership--the British responded to this movement by arresting the entire national leadership of the INC, which effectively killed the national movement--but spurred the development of secondary leaders in the provinces of the country. The leadership was arrested in 1942, and were to be held for the duration of the war. Gandhi was released in 1943, due to failing health. After his release, he went on a hunger strike in an attempt to win the release of the rest of the leadership.

C. Independence--it was apparent to many political leaders in Great Britain that the cost of maintaining India as a colony after the war would be more than the impoverished country could bear, and the decision was made to "grant" India independence.


1. Partition--the religious tensions between Muslims and Hindus, which the British had done much to foster (the ancient "divide and conquer" principle), impelled them to partition India at the time of independence, in order to attempt to diminish the likelihood of civil war--which happened anyway.


a. British arrogance--the British civil servant charged with drawing the boundaries for the two nations knew next to nothing about India, so the boundaries had nothing to with the majority population resident there. In addition, the two religions had co-existed in India so long that to make such a distinction was ludicrous, anyway.

b. Effect on India--since partition, politics in India has become more chauvinistic, with following the stricture of the Hindi religion becoming the defining characteristic of Indian nationalism--which leaves out all other religions.

c. Effect on Pakistan--with only Islam as a unifying principle (and even that being divisive, with the struggle between Sunni and Sha'ria for dominance), and with hundreds of miles dividing Pakistan from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), the military is the dominant institution--and democracy has suffered as a result.

II. Vietnam


A. French colonialism--began in 1858, when the French army and navy invaded to “protect” Roman Catholics in Vietnam who were being “persecuted.”

1. Collaborators--this labeled most Catholics in Vietnam as collaborators with the foreign enemy, which would have repercussions in the mid-20th century.

a) Dr. Tom Dooley, an American Catholic, and his accounts of communist treatment of Roman Catholics did much during the late 1950s (he was cited as an example of volunteerism by John F. Kennedy while the latter was establishing the Peace Corps). Dooley was cultivated by CIA agent Edward Lansdale, and probably gathered intelligence for the CIA while in southeast Asia.

2. French colonists--confined their activities largely to the lucrative rubber plantations, while allowing the elite in Vietnam (or, as the French preferred to say, Indochina or Cochin China; the French, in fact, forbade the use of the term Vietnam to refer to the country) to acquire most of the land and wealth they cared to not acquire for themselves, while peasants in the countryside were impoverished.


B. Ho Chi Minh--like Gandhi, Ho became the focal point for the independence movement in his country. Also like Gandhi, Ho was western educated--although his family was vehemently nationalist. His father was a minor mandarin, but refused to learn French because he claimed it would “spoil” his Vietnamese. Ho, like Gandhi, spent much of this public life dressed like a peasant, by choice, abandoning trappings of the office he attained.

1. Ho the Communist--Ho’s involvement with international communism dated from 1919 (even before Mao tse-Tung); he was one of the original members of the French Communist Party, and served for a number of years with the Comintern in Moscow as the expert on colonialism.

2. Ho the Nationalist--Ho petitioned the Versailles Conference to grant Vietnam independence, but was ignored. Ho collaborated with the United States Army Office of Strategic Services (the forerunner of the CIA) to defeat the Japanese, and then petitioned US president Harry Truman to support independence for the country, and was ignored. Ho forced emperor Bao Dai to abdicate, but was forced to accept the French re-establishing control; he immediately set about creating a resistance movement, however.


3. Dien Bien Phu--a contingent of French paratroopers were defeated at this battle and force to surrender, the French then signed the Geneva Accords. The country was divided “temporarily” into two sections at the insistence of the United States; France and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam agreed that reunification elections would be held in 1956, but the United States and Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) did not sign the accord, and felt no compunction to follow its edicts--particularly because the government in the south never had much popular support.


4. The American War in Vietnam--the most obvious instance of the United States fighting a proxy war against the Soviet Union, when the war was essentially fought by the opposing side to throw off the cloak of colonialism and become an independent country

III. Palestine/Israel


A. Muslim resistance--as Jews began moving to Palestine in larger numbers, establishing kibbutzes and moving in numbers into cities, Palestinians began attempting to discourage Jewish settlement, including physical violence.

1. 1929 Riot--dispute over “permanent” structures built by Jews at the Wailing Wall, which Muslim clerics demanded by removed in keeping with an Ottoman edict restricting such structures from being built. Resulted in the deaths of 133 Jews, and 116 Palestinians.

2. 1939 White Paper--proposal by Great Britain to resolve growing dispute over Palestine; centered on restricting immigration of Jews until an election was held in 1949, when Arabs and Jews would be seated in a government in proportion to their populations that year--but guaranteeing that Arabs would remain in the majority. In the end, the White Paper pleased no one--the Jews saw it as a death warrant for thousands (the Nazi pogrom was just getting underway), as well as stiemying their nationalist aspirations, while the Arabs saw it as not restrictive enough, because it would allow the Jews to undermine the postwar government

B. Jewish response--the response of Zionists varied across a wide spectrum, from tit-for-tat retaliation to organized terror campaigns.


1. Irgun--a secret Jewish armed group, which carried out a campaign of terror (bombings and attempted assassinations) against British government and military officials, mainly


a) King David Hotel bombing--Irgun operatives carried out this terrorist attack that resulted in the deaths of 91 people, including 17 Jews. Irgun leaders said they regretted the Jewish deaths and would pray for their souls, but did not regret the British deaths, because Great Britain had never expressed regret over the Jewish deaths during the Holocaust. No mention was made of the deaths of the largest group of death--Arabs.


b) Menachem Begin--led Irgun during this time period, and was the man who gave the order for the hotel to be blown up. After Israeli statehood, Begin became leader of the Likud Party, and by the late 1970s prime minister of Israel. In a bit of karmic irony, his autobiography, The Revolt, is must reading for Hamas and Hezbollah.


c) Lohamei Herut Israel--LEHI or the Stern Gang, a splinter group that broke off from Irgun, targeted Arab populations in a terror car-bombing campaign. Best known outside of Israel as the first organization to be labeled a “terrorist group” by the United Nations. Inside Israel, they are recognized as devoted patriots to the Zionist cause.


IV. The Battle for Algiers



A. The Front de Libération Nationale (FLN)--the FLN was the Algerian national liberation group that fought an eight year guerilla war against France (1954-1962) to gain independence. The FLN, an Arab-socialist political party, is still in control of the government in Algiers, although lately their leadership is being challenged by an Islamist political party.

1. Social/Cultural/Political movement--the FLN was not a Marxist party, but construed socialism broadly--mainly as a way of identifying oppressors and the oppressed.

a) Attempted to ferret out what they defined as destructive behaviors (consumption of alcohol and prostitution in particular).

b) Reform of these behaviors was seen as key to developing sense of national pride, since native Algerians were lowest on the totem pole in colonial Algerian society, below French and the pied noirs (literally, “black feet”), Algerian-born of European descent.


2. The “dirty war” French occupying forces did not hesitate to use what the Bush Administration would term “enhanced interrogation techniques” (what sane people recognize as torture).

3. FLN response--to use plastique in bombing raids against both French establishments and the French military.


a) Cafe wars in France--the struggle for control by elements of the FLN for the government-in-exile led to a series of assassination attempts on Algerian ex-pats in France, called the cafe wars.

4. Evian Accords--granted independence to Algeria (in quick stages)--but led more than a million pied noir to emigrate to France. In the mother country, however, these pied noir felt that the native French population blamed them for the war--but also felt estranged from their native Algeria.



a) Algeria and the fall of the Fourth Republic--the cost of the war in Algeria--and the way the “dirty war” was carried out by French forces, led to the French parliament granting President Charles de Gaulle near-dictatorial powers--and also led to the fall of the Fourth Republic.

Weekly Assignment 13

 Was the Cold War an inevitable consequence of the way World War II was conducted? Why, or why not. Your answer should fill at least two sides of 8.5x11, and be handed in by the beginning of class on Thursday, April 18.