I)
Spain and the
“Black Legend” -- Spain’s mistreatment
of native inhabitants in the New World legitimated the attempts by other
European governments (Netherlands, France, and England) to attempt to undermine
Spanish control, and to make their own claims in order to proselytize Christianity—and
to seek riches in the territory that they could claim and hold.
a. Cortes and Pizarro—the phenomenon success of Cortez
with the Aztecs and Pizarro with the Inca people set the early model for
Spanish behavior in the new world—the conquest. This model had only limited
success after Cortes and Pizarro, however; outside of the centralized native
societies in Mexico and South America, the Spanish found it nearly impossible
to maintain their advantage and control.
i. Cabeza de Vaca—part of a conquistadores party led by
Panfilo de Narvaez, who was determined to outdo rival Cortes in Florida.
Plagued by hit-and-run raids from Apalachee people, planned to build barges and
coast around Gulf from present-day Tampa back to Mexico; on the Texas coast
five barges caught in storm and wrecked. Passed among numerous native peoples
because of their “healing powers.” Ultimately made it back to Mexico, where
Cabeza de Vaca became an advocate for humane treatment of natives (and to
publish an account of the to-then inhumane treatment; along with Casas, these
accounts led to a change in policy for Spanish—but also to the idea of the
Black Legend); two others in the party came back with fantastic stories of lost
cities filled with gold.
ii. Hernando de Soto—accompanied Pizzaro to Peru, which
had made him a rich man, but he wanted to outdo Cortes, as well. Both Soto and
Coronado, who followed him, were suppose to follow the new, gentler
“pacification” policy of the Spanish government. Once in the bush, however,
both leaders permitted their men to follow the old conquistadores model of
rape, pillage, murder and mayhem. Along with the microbes that accompanied the
Spaniards, this devasted the Mississippian peoples, forcing them to abandon
their cities (the seats of their advanced culture), and move in among the hill
people, who had been their subjects, and who had a less advanced culture.
iii. Francisco Vasquez de Coronado—excited by the
prospects of finding “Cibola,” a city in the American southwest purported to
rival the wealth of Tenochtitlan, Coronado invested most of his own wealth in
financing a party to find it in 1540. As the group neared the Rio Grande, they
came upon a group of Pueblo people; appropriating their food, houses, and
women.
b.)
Spanish forces in Florida—because of the success of privateers, Spanish
officials came to see the necessity of controlling the waters between Florida
and the Bahamas. To that end, they set up a military installation at St.
Augustine, the first permanent settlement of Europeans in the present-day
confines of the US. In order to hold this settlement, however, felt it
necessary to defeat nearby settlement of French Huguenots (protestants) who the
Spanish “put to the knife.” Although maintaining St. Augustine was a money
loser, Spain did so in order to attempt to keep privateers from feasting on the
annual convoy between Mexico and Spain.
c)
Pueblo revolt of 1680 (aka Pope’s Rebellion)—explain the attempts by Dominican
friars to convert Pueblo people.
II) Native Culture in the Chesapeake
A) Native farming methods – reliant upon growing corn,
beans, squash, and gathering nuts and berries, as well as fruit (all of this
work was accomplished by women and children), which was supplemented by hunting
and fishing (done by the men of the group).
1) Field rotation – trees were girdled (explain
girdling—deep cuts were made in the trunk, which killed the tree and the
canopy, which allowed sunshine to reach the floor; fires were also set to clear
land, promote growth of berry plants).
After the fields were used for several years, the natives left the field
(allowing it to lie fallow—a practice also of the Europeans), and the process
was repeated at a new site. In this way,
the natives cultivated the forests, promoting the growth of plants the used for
food, and allowing the trees that remained to grow to great heights (since this
practice had been going on for several hundred years before the European
invasion)
2) One acre/person – it generally took slightly less
than an acre per person to grow a sufficient amount of food in the native
style; this style of agriculture is generally used in “underdeveloped”
countries (which included most of England at this time, outside of East Anglia,
were the Puritans originated).
3) Promotion of diversity of plant life – although
plant life was somewhat restricted by this practice, plant and animal life was
still relatively diverse, and therefore provided the natives with a diverse
diet; this probably prompted the English explorers and settlers in Roanoke to
proclaim the area a paradise.
4) Leisure time – this method of cultivation provided
the natives, particularly the men, with a great deal of leisure time, which
they used for other pursuits.
(a) Warfare – became a ritualized practice (if no less
deadly, in certain instances), a way to demonstrate masculinity rather than a
way to promote a particular political advantage (hegemony); wars were also a
way to gain population if it was diminishing.
B) Powhattan Confederacy – perhaps the single strongest
political organization of native peoples on the east coast; this fact spoiled
the English plan to play one group of native peoples against another (which was
suggested by Richard Hakulyt, after the Spanish method as practiced in Central
and South America)
1) Political situation – Powhattan’s rule was
relatively light-handed; other peoples did have to pay tribute, but it was not
excessive, and the benefits of remaining within the confederacy outweighed
anything the English were able to offer for a number of years.
III) English culture
A) Rule by the Elite – the House of Lords in 1603, the
eve of the English attempt to establish a permanent settlement in Virginia,
consisted of 55 nobles (expanded to 126 by 1628, as the king needed more
revenue and as the merchant class expanded); the so-called House of Commons was
larger, but really not much less elite—it was composed of (and elected by) the
economic elite of England, who used their positions to promote their continued
economic well-being (much like the Republican Party in the United States);
together the two houses were elected by and represented no more than 15% of the
adult male population in the country.
1) Local rule in the English cities, towns, and
countryside carried out by the nobility; local courts were run by an controlled
by this economic elite, which meant that “crimes” underwent a transformation,
which promoted the expropriation on the part of the economic elite of commons
areas, while criminalizing commoners use of the “commons.”
B) Sacred Law – derived from the King (who had declared
himself head of the Church in England), and the King then delegated this
authority to bishops, who in turn delegated a portion of this authority to
priests and other clergy at the local level.
The purpose of this was to control “moral” behavior (as defined by the
elite, of course), including the conduct of daily life.
C) The Protestant Work Ethic – the rejection of the
“idle” life; in part, this was related to the rejection of Catholicism and its
holy days, which were often the appropriation of a variety of pagan (that is,
pre-Christian) beliefs.
1) Statute of Artificers (1563) – this was a response
to the belief that the economic pie was of a fixed size, and that it had to be
divide up to give work to as many people as possible; this was also an early
attempt to legislate a change in the way people worked, and to criminalize the
resistance of workers against this new method of organizing work.
(a) Set hours of labor – March thru September, suppose
to work from 5am to 8pm, with meal time not to exceed 2 ½ hours all together
(work day was to equal a total of 12 hrs.).
The winter months’ workday was shorter, since the amount of daylight
precluded working a longer day.
(b) Set terms of apprenticeship – usually a seven-year
period; also set what they were to be provided at the end of their
apprenticeship.
(c) Forbade sons of craftsmen to learn another craft
(d) Forbade craftsmen to engage or practice another
craft than the one in which they had been appointed.
2) Life of the gentleman – defined, in part, by not
performing manual labor; a gentleman also supported a retinue of servants and
retainers.
IV) Clash of Cultures at Jamestown
A) Virginia Company – group of investors, expecting a
return on their investment, on the model of the West Indies Company that had
financed the sugar plantations in the British Caribbean
B) Captain John Smith – a much more complex character
than Disney would lead you to believe; short, swarthy, and hairy (by
contemporary accounts); Smith proposed to overcome the natives militarily and
then enslave them, using the Spanish model.
1) Jamestown settlement – reliant upon Smith’s ability
to cajole and threaten to get corn from the natives; the natives soon realize
this and threaten to abandon the area and allow whites to stave to death.
(a) Why did not natives follow through on this threat?
Trade?
C) “The Starving Time” (1607) – then inability of the
Jamestown settlement to grow enough food for themselves, combined with the
diseases they contracted which incapacitated a number of them, meant that for
the first several years the people of the settlement were reliant upon food
arriving for them from England. When
shipments were delayed or did not arrive, a number of settlers quietly starved
to death.
1) Smith’s leadership – ameliorated this condition
somewhat, since he decreed and enforced that all settlers were to put in 4-6
hours a day in the fields (or they would not eat).
(a) Reasons – the Virginia Company had no idea what it
would take to set up a productive colony in North America; they sent workers
like goldsmith and jewelers, whose crafts provided a newly established
settlement with no useful skills, and would not for a number of years; the
people sent to Jamestown were also top-heavy with gentlemen, who did no manual
labor by station, and not enough husbandmen and farmers.
2) Completely dependent upon natives supplying them
with food – but the relations with the natives were strained; battles with
natives broke out in which military operations were carried out which would
burn villages and destroy caches of the corn crop—which the English themselves
were dependent upon.
3) Cannibalism – Recorded instance, in which a man
killed his wife, chopped her up and ate her, in an area of abundant game, fish,
fruits, nuts, and berries. Also
instances of the dead being dug up so that the living could eat them.
D) Social composition of Jamestown settlers
1) Gentlemen – 36 of 105 settlers, which meant that
nearly 1/3 of settlers, expected that they would perform no manual labor
because it was beneath their station in life.
2) Craftsmen – made up the largest portion of the
population, but none expected to work outside of their area of training, or
outside of their craft (due to restrictions that they had always practiced that
craft under—namely, the Statute of Artificers. Too often, their particular craft was not
needed, so they sat around pursuing leisure activities (gambling, etc.) while
they and their fellows starved to death.
3) Husbandmen and farmers – made up the smallest
portion of the settlers, but they were expected to produce enough food for the
entire settlement.
This organization of
society seems senseless to us today—after all, if one were starving, why would
you just accept that fate and not try to find food for yourself? But many English were use to an inadequate
diet and hunger while they were in England, and they had no expectation that
life would be substantially different for them on a new continent.
V) The Tobacco Boom (1611-1630, approximately) – the
best grade of tobacco came to Europe from Turkey; Virginia tobacco was
considered a grade or two below that, but tobacco was destined to provide the
colony with a way to attract new investment.
At first, tobacco was seen as undesirable, an unclean habit; it
increasingly gained favor, however, with a resultant rise in the value of
tobacco.
A) Price boom – by 1619, the price a tobacco farmer
could get for tobacco was approximately three shillings a pound (or
approximately $1,500/hogshead barrel, which equaled about 300lbs.). This price only prevailed for about ten
years, however; as the market was flooded with Chesapeake tobacco, the price
declined, until in 1630 the price for a pound of tobacco had declined to about
a penny a pound (or $5.00/hogshead)
B) Labor shortage – to take advantage of this tobacco
boom, tobacco growers needed to get labor to the colony to produce the crop to
sell to merchants in England.
1) Tobacco labor-intensive – the growing, harvesting,
and processing of tobacco were all labor-intensive. It takes a year and a half for the tobacco
plant to mature, and the plant needs a lot of attention to flourish.
(a) One person could attend to approximately 2,000
tobacco plants, which in turn would yield about 500lbs of tobacco; therefore,
the more labor one could employ (but not necessarily in the definition of pay),
the greater one’s chances of making a substantial amount of money there were.
2) Labor “surplus” in England – England during this
time was undergoing a period of consolidation of land holdings on the part of
the landed gentry (the enclosure of the commons), and the early beginnings of
the Industrial Revolution (where peasants who where being pushed out of farming
were in the process of becoming wage workers in factories in urban areas).
3) Labor “recruitment” – from prisons and workhouses,
as well as those recruits of “spirits” and “crimps” who simply kidnapped
persons of the lower classes, and put them on ships to the Americas to be
employed as indentured servants (a practice which was known among this
population as being “barbadosed,” because Barbados was the destination of the
greatest share of such people, to work on the sugar plantations)
(a) “Seasoning” – ships with new indentured servants
usually arrived in Virginia at the beginning of summer. The combination of a
long, arduous journey, general malnutrition, and a variety of diseases then
prevalent during the summer in the Chesapeake area (like malaria, typhus, and
diphtheria), combined with the pace of work killed off a horrific number of
workers.
(b) Massacre of 1622 – a surprise attack by natives upon
Jamestown resulted in the killing of 347 men, women, and children; this
resulted in a retaliatory strike by the remaining Jamestown settlers, and a
determination to wipe out natives in the area once and for all; however, its
also prompted an investigation by Parliament which uncovered the fact that
despite the immigration of 3,570 people in the three years proceeding the
native attack, only 1,240 English subjects were alive at the time of the
attack. The population of Jamestown
before this period of intensive immigration was 700—which meant that 3,030
people had died in the preceding three year time period. On top of this, the Virginia Company was
nearly bankrupt; in 1624 the crown took over responsibility for the settlements
in Virginia. The population losses
decrease after this, but remained relatively high throughout the 1620s and
1630s.
C) Population increase from 1640 – due to the drop in
demand for tobacco (the market was glutted at this time period), other crops
were grown which were then sold to plantations in the Caribbean
1) Propagation of apple trees – used largely to make
cider, which meant that less contaminated water was consumed, which decreased
the prevalence of diseases like dysentery and typhus)
2) New arrivals in fall – rather than new workers
arriving in the beginning of summer, they arrived at the beginning of fall,
which gave them a longer time to acclimate themselves.
D) New Problems
1) Increased demand for land – as more servants
survived their period of indenture, there was a corresponding increase in the
demand for more land.
(a) Head rights – the term used to explain the right to
land that one claimed when it could be proven that one making such a claim had
paid for the passage of another to the colony (this helped provide a larger
number of planters to employ indentured servants, who themselves were usually
promised a substantial amount of land and the tools to work it in return for
their labor); because unimproved land was more valuable than improved land
(tobacco could only be grown for a three or four year period before exhausting
the land), those who could afford to employ indentured servants benefited.
2) Increased costs of labor – as more indentured
servants survived their period of service, they made greater demands for
land. When indentured servants did not
survive the seven years of their service, it was more economically viable for
large planters to employ indentured servants; as these indentured servants
began to live longer, however, the employment of slaves became more attractive.
(a) Higher initial cost of slavery – the employment of
slaves had a higher start-up cost; however, since one could amortize this cost
over the productive life of the slave, the cost ended up being less than that
for indentured servants.
No comments:
Post a Comment